In the decisions made during the YTCK period, the Court of Cassation accepts that in cases where more than one result occurs with an act, there may be an intellectual community, and accepts that what should be understood from a single act is not a single result, but a single action. Although the bodily action constitutes a separate movement, the point that is meant to be expressed by the fact that the movement is single in the legal sense is that even if there are more than one movement in the natural sense, these movements are accepted as a single movement by forming a unity in the evaluation due to legal reasons. In intellectual congregation, the jurisprudence states that the singularity of an act or action does not mean the same in a natural sense, but in a LEGAL sense. Although we have used the title of singularity of verb-multiplicity of verbs since it is mentioned in the second paragraph of Article 43 and Article 44 of the TPC, that more than one crime is committed with one act, we should state that the purpose of the verb is movement and this title should be understood as unity of action-multiplicity of action. . Excluding the chain crime relationship
As, in order to be able to talk about an association relationship, the movement must be unique, and since there can be no talk of an association relationship if the movement is more than one in the real sense, first of all, what should be understood from the concept of the unity of movement, which is the most important starting point of the association, and at this point, it is assumed that the movement is unique, except in the real sense of unity. conditions must also be explained.
