T.C.SUPREME law officeE. 2014/1591K. 2014/2198T. 20.2.2014 THE PROVISIONS OF the HMK CANNOT BE APPLIED IN CASES WHERE THERE IS A PROVISION IN THE SPECIAL LAW (The Request to Change the Name – Where There is a Provision That HMK Has a Non-Contentious Judicial Job and Will be Heard in the Magistrate’s Court / It will […]
T.C. SUPREME Law Department Article No:2018/2790Decision No :2018/5318Date of Decision : 28.05.2018 THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURTCOURT: Executive Civil CourtThe creditor of the appellant’s examination within the time limit of the court decision, the date and number of which are written aboveupon request by the department, the file related to this work has been […]
T.C SUPREME COURT 12. Law Department Article No:2018/3154Decision No :2018/7106Date of Decision : 02.07.2018 THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURTCOURT: Executive Civil CourtThe creditor of the appellant’s examination within the time limit of the court decision, the date and number of which are written aboveupon request by the department, the file related to this work […]
T.C THE SUPREME COURT Law Department Article No:2016/25431Decision No :2018/11110Date of Decision : 16.10.2018 SUPREME COURT DECISIONCOURT :Family CourtTYPE OF CASE : Divorce At the end of the Deci-sion of the case between the parties, the above date, which is given by the local courtand the sentence indicated in the number defendant-plaintiff accepted by the […]
T.C THE SUPREME COURT Law Department Article No:2016/5008Decision No :2016/7757Date of Decision : 12.05.2016 COURT: Magistrate’s CourtIn the petition for the lawsuit, the daughter, who is under guardianship, has her own last name….asit has been requested to be replaced. The court decided to accept the case, the verdict was given by the defendant …it has […]
T.C THE SUPREME COURT law office Mainly No:2015/7405Decision No:2017/369Date of Decision: 17.01.2017 THE CASE OF LIQUIDATION OF THE GOODS REGIME – OF A CLERICAL NATUREDUE TO THE ACQUISITION OF REAL ESTATE BY DONATION, THE DEFENDANTIT IS HIS PERSONAL PROPERTY AND CANNOT BE INCLUDED IN THE LIQUIDATION –A DECISION ON THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE CLAIMANT’S CLAIM […]
T.C.SUPREME law officeE. 2015/15599K. 2018/332T. 15.1.2018At the end of the trial between the parties in the case described above DecThe court decided to dismiss the case and appeal the decision by the plaintiffon it, the Apartment’s file was examined, the need was considered:DECISION : Conditional follow-up based on the statement that the debtor’s deputy will […]
T.C. SUPREME Law Department Article No:2014/19529Decision No: 2014/20906 Decision Date: 24.06.2014 SUPREME COURT DECISIONCOURT: Şereflikoçhisar 1. The Court Of First InstanceDATE: 29/01/2013NUMBER: 2011/180-2013/76 At the end of the trial of the receivables case between the parties, for the reasons written in the decdefendants within the period of the provision issued for partial acceptance of the […]
Summary: Although the amount due on 30.03.2009, the last installment date, is not specified in the commitment minutes and is written as “the remaining part”; when the commitment minutes dated 15.02.2008 are carefully examined, the borrower; principal receivable, collection fee, interest paid, subsequent interest, commission, etc. by showing such expenses separately, he accepts that the […]
T.C.Supreme law office Base No:2014/14603Decision No:2015/30987K. Date:3.11.2015 The plaintiff has requested that it be decided that the permit fee will be paid.The local court has decided to partially accept the case.Although the defendant was appealed by his lawyer during the sentencing period, after hearing the report prepared by the Examining Judge for the case file, […]
