If a negative declaratory action is filed, does the enforcement proceeding stop? Only the fact that a lawsuit has been filed regarding non-indebtedness does not stop the proceedings to be made. In order to stop the proceedings to be made or have been made, it should also be requested from the court to issue an […]
T.R. SUPREME COURT Legal DepartmentBasis: 2014/16696Decision: 2016/5804Decision Date: 10.09.2016 ACTION FOR CANCELLATION OF THE DEED AND REGISTRATION – THE LEGAL AND LEGAL REASONS ON THE PROVISION, THERE IS NO MISFAILITY OF THE EVIDENCE – APPROVAL OF THE PROVISION SUMMARY: In the lawsuit regarding the cancellation and registration of the title deed, there was no mismatch […]
T.R. SUPREME COURT Law OfficeBasis: 2016/635Decision: 2016/7543Decision Date: 28.06.2016 REQUEST FOR CANCELLATION OF CADASTRE DETECTIONS – IF THE CADASTRE MINUTES IS THE FOLLOWER, THE CASE FILE MUST BE TAKEN BETWEEN THE FILE AND A DECISION MUST BE MADE ACCORDINGLY TO THE IMMOVABLE FILE SUMMARY: In addition, in the discovery dated …, the plaintiff declared that […]
T.R. SUPREME COURT Legal DepartmentBasis: 2016/6780Decision: 2016/12633Decision Date: 28.06.2016 CASE OF CONTRIBUTION RECEIPT – DECISION FOR NO DECISION FOR THE CONTRIBUTION REGARDING IMMOVABLE PROPERTY ACQUIRED DURING THE PROPERTY SEPARATION REGIME – NO DECISION FOR THE VALIDITY OF INTEREST ON THE TOTAL AMOUNT AWARDED BY THE DATE OF THE CASE SUMMARY: Since the lawsuit is about […]
…. TO THE FAMILY COURT Plaintiff: ATTORNEY: DEFENDANT: SUBJECT: It is our request to abolish the property regime. DESCRIPTIONS : 1-) Our client and the defendant have been married since …/…/…. As a result of the lawsuit pending … the Family Court’s …./…. E. …./…. K. decided that the parties should live separately for … […]
T.R. SUPREME COURT Law OfficeBasis: 2016/3455Decision: 2016/3829Decision Date: 12.07.2016 ACTION FOR CANCELLATION OF THE OBJECTION – IF THE FEES AND EXPENSES ARE NOT COMPLETED WITHIN THE GIVEN TIME, THE DECISION WILL BE ASSUMED WITH NO APPEAL – THE COURT CANNOT FILE ACTION TO COMPLETE THE MISSING FEE – SUMMARY: It has been regulated that if […]
T.R. SUPREME COURT Criminal ChamberBasis: 2016/10041Decision: 2016/9083Decision Date: 30.06.2016 CRIME OF USE OF CONFIDENCE DUE TO SERVICE – NO POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE DECISION IS MADE ABOUT THE ISSUE – THE PROVISION SHOULD BE OVERFUSED SUMMARY: Pursuant to article . of TPC, deprivation of rights written in sub-clause (c) of paragraph . without considering the necessity […]
T.R. SUPREME COURT Criminal ChamberBasis: 2014/29494Decision: 2016/9095Decision Date: 30.06.2016 OBJECTIVE CRIME NUMBER 4733 – THE ACTION BY TWO PERSONS IS CONSIDERED TO BE PERFORMED BY TWO PERSONS, AND THE PUNITIONS OF THE JURISDICTIONS SHOULD BE INCREASED. SUMMARY: In the judgment established on the accused who was charged with the crime of opposition, no. 4733, it […]
T.R. SUPREME COURT Criminal ChamberBasis: 2014/28371Decision: 2016/9088Decision Date: 30.06.2016 Smuggling Crime – JURISDICTION EXPENSES NEED TO BE ADDED TO THE AMOUNT OF PREPAID PAYMENT – PREPAYMENT PROPOSAL ON THE PROPOSAL OF THE PREPAYMENT ON THE AMOUNT OF RELATIVE FEE AND RELATIVE ATTORNEY FEE INCLUDING IN THE AMOUNT OF THE PREPAID PAYMENT. SUMMARY: While the actions […]
TO FAMILY COURT JUDGE; Plaintiff: TURKISH IDENTITY NUMBER : ADDRESS : ATTORNEY: (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) DEFENDANT: ADDRESS : SUBJECT : Our request for determination of paternity and precautionary alimony is related. DESCRIPTIONS : 1-) Our client and the defendant were married for 3 years. A marriage ceremony was held between the […]
