antalya

T.R. SUPREME COURT Legal DepartmentBasis: 2016/3404Decision: 2016/7050Decision Date: 09.06.2016 PREVENTION OF ELATMAN, DESTROYMENT ACTION – WHO OWNS THE FLOODED BUILDING MUST BE DETERMINED WITHOUT SUSPECT, AND THE WHOLE BUILDING MUST BE DUE TO STORAGE THE VALUE TO THE COURT AT THE COURT SUMMARY: All the records and documents regarding the zoning application are brought from […]

TO THE JUDICIARY OF THE CIVIL COURT OF PEACE Plaintiff: ADDRESS : ATTORNEY: ADDRESS : DEFENDANT: ADDRESS : SUBJECT : It consists of our request for the elimination of partnership in inheritance. DESCRIPTIONS : There is joint ownership between the plaintiff client and the defendant heirs on the immovable property registered in Sivas province, Kangal […]

TO THE CIVIL COURT OF MAGIC Plaintiff: TURKISH IDENTITY NUMBER : ADDRESS : ATTORNEY: (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) ADDRESS : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) DEFENDANTS: 1- 2nd- ADDRESS : SUBJECT : Request for Elimination of Stakeholders in the Real Estate consists of. DESCRIPTIONS : 1- Our client, together with […]

Izale-i Şuyu or the lawsuit for the dissolution of partnership is a type of lawsuit that ends the partnership between the partners in the movable or immovable property subject to shared or joint ownership, and provides similar results for all parties to the lawsuit. Each of the stakeholders may request the sharing of the property, […]

Sharing is carried out in the form of dividing the property exactly or selling it by bargaining or auctioning and dividing the price. If there is no agreement in the form of sharing, upon the request of one of the stakeholders, the judge decides to divide the property in the same way, and if the […]

Status of the usufruct owner Article 700 – In case a shareholder establishes usufruct right on his/her own share, if one of the other stakeholders requests to share within three months starting from the notification of the establishment of the usufruct right; The right of usufruct in sharing through sale continues on the price to […]

T.R. SUPREME COURT Criminal ChamberBasis: 2013/32150Decision: 2016/5596Decision Date: 29.06.2016 LOADING CRIME – WITH THE DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, THE PRESENTATION OF ELECTION AND OTHER POLITICAL RIGHTS WRITTEN IN THE TPC ARTICLE IS CANCELED, AND THE PROVISION IS APPROVED SUMMARY: With the decision of the Constitutional Court, dated 08.10.2015, numbered 2014/140-2015/85, the phrase “to elect, […]

T.R. SUPREME COURT Criminal ChamberBasis: 2013/28250Decision: 2016/5651Decision Date: 29.06.2016 THE CRIME OF BIASING CONFIDENCE DUE TO THE SERVICE – Failing to consider that the tort constituting a crime should be evaluated within the scope of TPC ARTICLE 150, numbered 5237 SUMMARY: It is not taken into account that the wrongful act of the accused, who […]

T.R. SUPREME COURT Criminal ChamberBasis: 2016/3945Decision: 2016/5659Decision Date: 29.06.2016 LOADING – INCORRECT JURISDICTION OF THE CRIMES OF LOADING AND MEMBERSHIP OF CRIMINAL ORGANIZATIONS WITH INSUFFICIENT AND INSUFFICIENT REASONS SUMMARY: Conviction of the accused on the charges of looting and membership of a criminal organization on the contrary, with appropriate and insufficient justification, without being discussed […]

T.R. SUPREME COURT Criminal ChamberBasis: 2015/1208Decision: 2016/5621Decision Date: 29.06.2016 LOADING CRIME – AT THE EVENT DEVELOPING IN THE EVENT WHERE THE DEFENDANT TRIED TO HIT THE CLIENT BY WAITING THE KNIFE WHILE HOLDING THE CLIENT, AND THE CLIENT ESCAPE TO Escape SUMMARY: In the incident that developed in the form of the accused, who was […]