… TO THE MAGISTRATE’S COURT PLAINTIFF : TC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER : ADDRESS : Deputy : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) ADDRESS : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) Defendants: 1- 2- Address : Subject : from the request for elimination of stakeholders in real estate references INSTRUCTIONS : 1-Our client has built […]
… TO THE MAGISTRATE’S COURT PLAINTIFF : TC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER : ADDRESS : Deputy : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) ADDRESS : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) Defendants: 1- 2- Address : Subject: it consists of the desire to eliminate the partnership by establishing condominium. Our explanations : 1 -) Our […]
… MAGISTRATE’S COURT JUDGE PLAINTIFF : TC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER : ADDRESS : Deputy : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) ADDRESS : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) DEFENDANT : Address : Subject: Heritage consists of our desire to eliminate the partnership. INSTRUCTIONS : 1 -) Muris … … died on the date […]
T.C. SUPREME 1.Legal DepartmentMainly: 2015/3581Decision: 2016/7039Decision Date: 09.06.2016 ECRIMISIL CASE – THE REALIZATION OF THE USUFRUCT BAN CONDITION IN TERMS OF REAL ESTATE WILL BE SOUGHT – WHETHER THE ACTUAL USE THAT BINDS ALL STAKEHOLDERS IN THE CONTENTIOUS REAL ESTATE WHERE THE 3-STOREY BUILDING IS LOCATED IS NOT DETERMINED – THE PROVISION IS BROKEN Abstract: […]
T.C. SUPREME 3.Legal DepartmentMainly: 2016/8735Verdict: 2016/10148Decision Date: 27.06.2016 CREDIT CASE – FAILURE TO DISCUSS WHETHER THE PLAINTIFF, WHO DOES NOT OBJECT TO THE VALUATION REPORT, CAN CLAIM THIS PRICE IN THIS CASE – THE PROVISION IS BROKEN Abstract: whether the irrigation well costs that were not taken into account during the valuation made in the […]
T.C. SUPREME 20.Legal DepartmentBasis: 2016/4846Decision: 2016/6835Decision Date: 13.06.2016 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES – THE NEED FOR THE CASES TO BE HEARD TOGETHER AND FOR THE DISPUTE TO BE RESOLVED BY THE COMMERCIAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE, WHICH IS A SPECIAL COURT IN TERMS OF ALL CLAIMS – DETERMINATION OF THE COMMERCIAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE AS […]
T.C. SUPREME 17.Legal DepartmentBasis: 2016/5641Decision: 2016/7179Decision Date: 13.06.2016 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES – THE COURT MUST RULE ON INTEREST ONLY FOR THE PART OF THE PRICE INCREASED FROM THE DATE OF THE CASE – CORRECTION AND APPROVAL OF THE PROVISION Abstract: in a concrete case, interest was not requested in relation to financial compensation in TL, […]
… TO THE JUDGE OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE; PLAINTIFF : TC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER : ADDRESS : Deputy : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) ADDRESS : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) DEFENDANT : ADDRESS : Deputy : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) ADDRESS : (Legal representatives of the […]
… TO THE JUDGE OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE; PLAINTIFF : TC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER : ADDRESS : Deputy : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) ADDRESS : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) DEFENDANT : Address : Subject:…./…./…. Along with the legal interest that will be processed as of the date of […]
1-Accident Date Time Province: Neighborhood:2-Accident Place District: Street:Neighborhood: Street:3-EyewitnessesName Surname Address Tel No.:A 8 – mark (x) in the appropriate boxes BVehicle a red light violation vehicle B4 – Driver Information vehicle cannot enter the roadway with the sign 4-driver informationFirst Name Last Name: entering the road used by traffic from the opposite direction First […]
