T.C. SUPREME Law Department Article No:2014/19529Decision No: 2014/20906 Decision Date: 24.06.2014 SUPREME COURT DECISIONCOURT: Şereflikoçhisar 1. The Court Of First InstanceDATE: 29/01/2013NUMBER: 2011/180-2013/76 At the end of the trial of the receivables case between the parties, for the reasons written in the decdefendants within the period of the provision issued for the partial acceptance of […]
T.C. SUPREME COURT 22. Law Department Article No:2018/6283Decision No:2018/10735Date of Decision: 04.05.2018EMPLOYEE RECEIVABLES LAWSUIT – THE SUBJECT OF THE LAWSUIT IS COMPENSATION ANDTECHNICAL AND EXPERTISE OF CALCULATION OF RECEIVABLES– AN ADVANCE FOR THE SUBSTITUTION OF EVIDENCE – THE CASE DOES NOT REQUIRESINCE IT CANNOT BE PROVEN, THE INACCURACY OF BET REJECTION –VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION […]
T.C. SUPREME COURT 22. Law Department Article No:2015/16933Decision No:2017/19050 Date of Decision: 25.09.2017The Decision of the Supreme CourtTRIBUNAL: Employment TribunalCASE TYPE: RECEIVABLEExamination of the decision made as a result of the lawsuit between the parties on appeal by the dectiff’s deputyas requested by the court, it became clear that the appeal request was in due […]
T.C.SUPREME CRIMINAL DEPARTMENTMAINLY NO:2015/2372DECISION NO:2015/12784DATE OF DECISION:07.12.2015 C. THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE HAS THE AUTHORITY TO OVERTURN THE DECISION OF NON-PROSECUTION FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE LAW – DEFAMATION AND THREAT-TAKTIR ABSTRACT: In the article of the request; “Article 160 of the Code of Criminal Procedure No. 5271. as soon as the public prosecutor finds out […]
T.CSUPREME17.law officeMAINLY NO:2017/5716DECISION NO:2018/1495DATE OF DECISION:01/03/2018COURT OF First Instance: Court of First Instance SINCE THERE IS A MÜTERAFIK DEFECT DUE TO A TRAFFIC ACCIDENT, HELMET NOT BEING WORN, A MÜTERAFIK DEFECT DISCOUNT OF AT LEAST 20% WILL BE REQUIRED ACCORDING TO ESTABLISHED PRACTICES. At the end of the trial of the compensation case between the […]
T.C.SUPREME law officeMAINLY NO: 2016/3357DECISION NO: 2016/13899DATE OF DECISION: 24.10.2016 FOREIGN EXCHANGE TRACKING, A CASE OF FALSE IDENTIFICATION BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A GUARANTEE BILL, THE BURDEN OF PROOF AND THE STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY : The case is related to the foul determination request. The plaintiff has requested […]
COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartmentMain: 2014/9570Decision: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems AssociationDeputy : Av… Defendant : Banking Regulation and Supervision AgencyDeputy : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles Related to Fees to be Charged to Financial Consumers, which was published in the Official Gazette dated 03.10.2014 […]
T.C.SUPREME law officeMAINLY NO: 2017/5716DECISION NO: 2017/14596DATE OF DECISION: 2.10.2017 ABSTRACT: The employer of the employee working in the places subject to condominium ownership is the condominium owners, and the condominiums are equally responsible for the labor receivables. The management is in the position of acting employer. Although it is appropriate to open a case […]
T.C.Council Apartment Mainly No:2013/1150Decision No:2013/9562K. Date:9.12.2013 Summary : About the fact that the amount reached when calculating the base on the basis of the profitability ratio of the sector in construction and contracting works reflects the taxable profit of the enterprise, it is necessary to assume that all expenses incurred during the performance of work […]
T.C.Supreme law office Base No:2014/12697Decision No:2015/10020K. Date:6.10.2015 Malatya 4 in the case between the parties. dec. Examination of the decision No. 2012/483-2013 dated 12/09/2013 issued by the Court of First Instance by the Court of Cassation The plaintiff’s deputy and fer of the company intervened Y.. S.. with P.. P.. it was requested by the […]
