Alanya Lawyer
Aşıkoğlu Law ™ is an International Law Office,
which is effective in especially Alanya and Antalya including Manavgat, Side, Belek, Kemer, Lara, Gazipaşa, Demre. And also in Istanbul, Izmir, Fethiye, Marmaris, Bodrum, Kuşadası and other south-estern side of Turkey. Property and Real Estate Law, Criminal Law, Contract Law, Insurance Law, Compensation Law, Injury & Accidents Law, Commercial Law, Busines Law, Labor Law, Civil Law, Family Law, Inheritance Law, Bankruptcy and Enforcement Law, Aviation Law, Tourism Law and Foreigners Law are some of our practice areas. If you want to get knowledge about all please click here.
In this section you can check the written texts, articles about Turkish law.
You can check our main team with clicking here.
Also you can contact with us if you need by mail, phone number or with using Consultation page.
Is It Mandatory For Payroll Witnesses To Be Heard In Service Detection Cases
The cases filed by workers who work without insurance without insurance in order to make these working periods insured are called service detection cases. According to Article 86/7 of Social Insurance and General Health Insurance Law No. 5510; monthly premium and service certificate or concise and premium service declaration are not issued by the employer […]
The Real Estate Which Is Not Determined To Be Owned By The Spouses Is Deemed To Be Their Share Property
T.C.Supreme8. Legal Department Principal No: 2014/14603Decision No: 2015/21591Decision Date: 2.12.2015 N.. B.. with M.. He.. the court of First Instance of Karamürsel for the rejection of the claim arising from the property regime between them 14.02.2014 days and … the decision of the Court of Cassation by the attorney of the plaintiff to review the […]
Ignoring The Work Of The Worker Before Being Staffed
T.C.SUPREMEGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF LAWPRINCIPAL NO: 2018/7-179DECISION NO: 2018/683DECISION DATE: 4.4.2018 > > THERE IS NO LEGAL BASIS FOR CREATING A QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE WORK BEFORE EMPLOYMENT AND THE WORK AFTER EMPLOYMENT, OR FOR TAKING ACTION AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF BY IGNORING THE WORK BEFORE EMPLOYMENT– THE FACT THAT THE WORKER, WHO IS ECONOMICALLY DEPENDENT ON […]
Sale Of The Company’s Real Estate At a Lower Price
T.C.Supreme11. Legal Department Principal No: 2014/12697Decision No: 2015/10020Decision Date: 6.10.2015 Malatya 4. Examination of the decision no. 2012/483-2013/323 of 12/09/2013 issued by the court of first instance by the Court of Cassation. S.. with S.. P.. after hearing the report prepared by the examination Judge for the case file, the petition, the proceedings, the minutes […]
Inflation Differential-Supreme Court Decision
T.C.Council4. Department Principal No: 2013/1150Decision No: 2013/9562Decision Date: 9.12.2013 Summary: it is necessary to acknowledge that the amount reached when the base is calculated on the basis of the sector’s profitability ratio in construction and contracting works reflects the taxable income of the enterprise and that all expenses incurred during the construction of the business […]
Floor Ownership Is The Employer Of The Workers Who Work In The Workplace Subject To The Law
T.C.SUPREME9. LEGAL DEPARTMENTPRINCIPAL NO: 2017/5716DECISION NO: 2017/14596DECISION DATE: 2.10.2017 Summary: the employer of the worker who works in places subject to floor ownership is the floor owners and the floor owners are equally responsible for the labor receivables. The management is the employer representative. Although the case against the management is in place, the provision […]
The Decision Of The State Council That The Consumer Bank Will Not Receive An Account Transaction Fee
Council of state 15. APARTMENTBasis: 2014/9570Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Issues AssociationDeputy: … Defendant: Banking Regulation and Supervision AgencyDeputy: … Summary of the case: Regulation on procedures and principles regarding fees to be received from financial consumers, which was published in the Official Gazette dated 03.10.2014 and numbered 29138, 10. Article 1. paragraph 13. Article […]
Negative Detection Case Based On Collateral Claim
T.C.SUPREME19. LEGAL DEPARTMENTPRINCIPAL NO: 2016/3357DECISION NO: 2016/13899DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 > > EXCHANGE FOLLOW-UP, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE DEED IS A GUARANTEE, BURDEN OF PROOF AND EVIDENCE STATUS 6100 / m.222/5 6102 / m.64 Summary: the case is related to the negative determination prompt. The plaintiff, due to the follow-up related […]
Re-examination Of The Non-Follow-up Decision Of The Public Prosecutor’s Office.
T.C.SUPREME18. CRIMINAL DEPARTMENTPRINCIPAL NO: 2015/2372DECISION NO: 2015/12784DECISION DATE: 07.12.2015 > C. PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE LAW TO BREAK THE DECISION OF NON-FOLLOW-UP-INSULT AND THREAT-APPROVAL AUTHORITY Abstract: in the article of request; ” Criminal Procedure Law No. 5271 No. 160. “as soon as the public prosecutor learns of a situation that gives the […]
