Extortion Crime Effective Repentance And Sentence Reduction
Effective remorse provisions do not apply to this offence. However, the prison sentence can be reduced up to 1/2 (TCK md.250/4).
Aşıkoğlu Law ™ is an International Law Office,
which is effective in especially Alanya and Antalya including Manavgat, Side, Belek, Kemer, Lara, Gazipaşa, Demre. And also in Istanbul, Izmir, Fethiye, Marmaris, Bodrum, Kuşadası and other south-estern side of Turkey. Property and Real Estate Law, Criminal Law, Contract Law, Insurance Law, Compensation Law, Injury & Accidents Law, Commercial Law, Busines Law, Labor Law, Civil Law, Family Law, Inheritance Law, Bankruptcy and Enforcement Law, Aviation Law, Tourism Law and Foreigners Law are some of our practice areas. If you want to get knowledge about all please click here.
In this section you can check the written texts, articles about Turkish law.
You can check our main team with clicking here.
Also you can contact with us if you need by mail, phone number or with using Consultation page.
Effective remorse provisions do not apply to this offence. However, the prison sentence can be reduced up to 1/2 (TCK md.250/4).
(1) a public official who instigates a person to benefit himself or anyone else by abusing the influence provided by his / her duty, or to make promises in this way, shall be sentenced to imprisonment of five to ten years. The existence of the invention shall be accepted in the event that the person […]
Embezzlement is not a crime that depends on the complaint. The prosecution may start an investigation after the crime has been committed. The statute of limitations for embezzlement is 15 years. An investigation and prosecution can be carried out within this time by notifying the prosecutor that a crime has been committed.
FAMILY COURT Requesting: A……., B…… (The mother and father) Prompt: permission for the consumption of the child’s property Legal evidence: bank records,School expense documents, population records and other evidence. Legal reasons: TMK. 327. and sequel Instructions 1- ……. born……….the boy named is the co-child of our clients. 2-Joint children for our clients on behalf of […]
Property Separation Regime within the framework of the following provisions: 1- Each of the spouses will have the right of management, use and disposal on their own assets within the legal limits. 2- The spouse who claims that a certain property belongs to him will be obliged to prove his claim. The goods whose belonging […]
T.C. SUPREME11.Legal DepartmentBasis: 2003/13739Verdict: 2004/8533Decision Date: 20.09.2004 Case: Şereflikoçhisar First Instance in the case seen between the parties 2.Examination of the decision no. 2002/98-2003/107 of 26.06.2003 issued by the court of Cassation by the court of Cassation was requested by the deputy plaintiff and the defendant cooperative and a number of defendants deputies and it […]
CIVIL COURT FILE NO : ……../………… PLAINTIFF : Surrogates: Av. MEHMET AŞIKOĞLU & Av. SANCAR AKIŞOĞLU Hunt. GAMZE GÖKÇEOĞLU & Av. AHMET YASIN YILDIZ Address: written on letterhead. Subject matter : ………….Dated Court 3. it is the fulfillment of the numbered Dec. INSTRUCTIONS In the case of your court given the original number above…./……/……… we […]
TO THE SUPREME COURT…… LAW DEPARTMENT. To Be Sent CIVIL COURT Local M. FILE NO:…./…../…….. DECISION CORRECTION PLAINTIFF SEEKING : Surrogates: Av. MEHMET AŞIKOĞLU & AV. SANCAR AKIŞOĞLU GAMZE GÖKÇEOĞLU & AV. AHMET YASIN YILDIZDEFENDANT : Acting : SUBJECT : Supreme Court…… Law Offices Of ……..Date and………….. …….It is our request to correct the decision […]
MAGISTRATES ‘ COURT TO HAKIMLIGIALANYA FILE NO :……./……..- E. Subject: the text of the oath is about. During April April 2004 and April 2005, the plaintiff was subject to enforcement proceedings for the duration of the 1-year lease agreement …………….. that the plaintiff has not vacated my property before the lease period of 2004, and […]
T.C. SUPREME GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF LAW 2009/13-183 2009/243 3.6.2009 Claim for pecuniary and moral damages ( due to the defective vehicle/where the plaintiff has stated individually and clearly that they do not claim-where the amount ruled by the judge is proportional to the claim/there is no violation of the principle of allegiance to the claim […]