Aşıkoğlu Law ™ is an International Law Office,
which is effective in especially Alanya and Antalya including Manavgat, Side, Belek, Kemer, Lara, Gazipaşa, Demre. And also in Istanbul, Izmir, Fethiye, Marmaris, Bodrum, Kuşadası and other south-estern side of Turkey. Property and Real Estate Law, Criminal Law, Contract Law, Insurance Law, Compensation Law, Injury & Accidents Law, Commercial Law, Busines Law, Labor Law, Civil Law, Family Law, Inheritance Law, Bankruptcy and Enforcement Law, Aviation Law, Tourism Law and Foreigners Law are some of our practice areas. If you want to get knowledge about all please click here.
In this section you can check the written texts, articles about Turkish law.
You can check our main team with clicking here.
Also you can contact with us if you need by mail, phone number or with using Consultation page.
T.C. SUPREME 20.Criminal DivisionPrincipal: 2015/2549Decision: 2016/7501Decision Date: 27.06.2016 CASE FOR CANCELLATION AND REGISTRATION-LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE RETENTION OF THE LAND REGISTRY – REGISTRATION ON BEHALF OF HEIRS IS BASED ON A COURT DECISION – THE PLAINTIFF DOES NOT HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO TRANSFER THE TITLE DEED BY OBTAINING A DOCUMENT STATING THAT HE IS THE […]
T.C. SUPREME 20.Legal DepartmentBasis: 2016/3944Decision: 2016/7541Decision Date: 28.06.2016 CADASTRAL TESBITINE APPEAL CASE – WHETHER THE REAL ESTATE IS WATER OR DRY AGRICULTURAL LAND, THE AGRICULTURAL ENGINEER SHOULD RECEIVE A REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PURPOSE OF THE LAW AND A DECISION SHOULD BE MADE WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE RESULT THAT WILL OCCUR Abstract: as […]
T.C. SUPREME 2.Legal DepartmentBasis: 2016/13586Verdict: 2016/12490Decision Date: 28.06.2016 DIVORCE CASE – WHERE THE HEIRS OF THE DEFENDANT HAVE THE RIGHT TO PROCEED WITH THE CASE – THE WAIVER OF THE PLAINTIFF WILL NOT RESULT IN A PROVISION – THE NEED TO DETERMINE THE CASES OF DEFECTS OF THE PARTIES – VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION Summary: […]
He who is removed from the inheritance cannot receive a share of the inheritance, nor can he file a claim for tenkis. If the heir has not made any other savings, the share of the inheritance of the person removed from the inheritance remains to the child, if any, if the person removed from the […]
Subtraction from inheritance is valid only if the inheritor has indicated the reason for subtraction in his savings related to it. If the person removed from the inheritance objects, proof of the existence of the specified cause falls to the heir or will creditor who benefits from the removal. If the existence of the cause […]
Removal from inheritanceI. Causes In the following cases, the heir can deduct his heir from the inheritance with a savings related to death: 1. If the heiress has committed a felony against the heiress or one of the relatives of the heiress, 2. If the heiress has not substantially fulfilled her obligations arising from family […]
The electoral movements of the basic form of the crime of prostitution are: Incitement to prostitution: the crime of incitement to prostitution occurs when a person who does not intend to commit prostitution tries to create a will in him to commit prostitution. Ensuring a partial or complete livelihood by benefiting from the earnings of […]
227 of TCK No. 5237. according to the article, the crimes punishable by being considered as a crime of prostitution are as follows: Offence of incitement to prostitution (TCK 227/2),Crime of facilitating prostitution (TCK 227/2),Crime of mediating prostitution (TCK 227/2),Crime of providing a place for prostitution (TCK 227/2),Child prostitution offence (TCK 227/1),A qualified crime in […]
T.C. SUPREME 3.Legal DepartmentBasis: 2016/5899Verdict: 2016/10153Decision Date: 27.06.2016 A CASE FOR INCREASING CHILD SUPPORT-THE FACT THAT THE OUT-OF-COURT FATHER COVERS THE PLAINTIFF’S EXPENSES, AS WELL AS PAYS CHILD SUPPORT FOR OTHER COMMON CHILDREN WHOSE CUSTODY IS IN THE DEFENDANT – VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION Abstract: the court; the economic and social situation of the parties, […]
T.C. SUPREME 15.Legal DepartmentBasis: 2016/1046Decision: 2016/3719Decision Date: 28.06.2016 A CASE FOR COLLECTING A PENALTY FOR DELAY ARISING FROM THE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE WORK CONTRACT – IT IS LEGALLY POSSIBLE FOR THE PLAINTIFF TO REQUEST INTEREST BY RECLAMATION – FAILURE TO REJECT THE INTEREST REQUEST WITH CONTRARY CONSIDERATIONS – CORRECTION AND APPROVAL OF THE PROVISION Abstract: […]
