Confiscation and expertise in traffic accidents Article 83 – Traffic accidents; a) To the local general constabulary, in order to take necessary action from the judicial side, b) It is seized by the traffic police in order to determine the causes, traces and evidences of the accident and to draw up a traffic accident report. […]
1- Accident Date Time City: Neighborhood:2-Accident Location District: Street:District: Street:3-EyewitnessesName Surname Address Tel No:A 8- Mark (x) in the Appropriate Boxes BVEHICLE A Violating a red light VEHICLE B4- Driver Information Entering the highway with no vehicles sign 4- Driver InformationName Surname: Entering the road used by the traffic coming from the opposite direction Name […]
T.R. SUPREME COURT Department of LawBasis: 2015/18158Decision: 2016/9853Decision Date: 14.06.2016 ACTION FOR DETERMINATION – WHEN THERE IS NO DISPUTE THAT THE DEATH WORKS WITH INSURED AT THE DEFENDANT’S WORKPLACE, THERE IS NO CONDITIONS FOR GOING TO THE PROVINCE – THE OWNER’S PERSONAL BUSINESS IS GOING TO THIS JURISDICTION AND JURISDICTION SUMMARY: In the concrete case; […]
T.R. SUPREME COURT Law OfficeBasis: 2016/5641Decision: 2016/7179Decision Date: 13.06.2016 ACTION FOR DAMAGES – THE COURT SHOULD IMPLEMENT THE INTEREST FROM THE DATE OF THE CASE FOR ONLY THE PART OF THE AMOUNT INCREASED – APPROVED BY CORRECTION OF THE JUDGMENT SUMMARY: In the concrete case, no interest was demanded regarding the pecuniary damages of … […]
T.R. SUPREME COURT Law OfficeBasis: 2016/4846Decision: 2016/6835Decision Date: 13.06.2016 ACTION FOR DAMAGES – CLAIMS TO BE HELD TOGETHER AND THE DISPUTE TO BE RESOLVED BY THE PRIMARY COMMERCE COURT, THE SPECIAL COURT – AS THE JURISDICTION OF THE COMMERCIAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE SUMMARY: The case is about the request for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages […]
T.R. SUPREME COURT Legal DepartmentBasis: 2015/3581Decision: 2016/7039Decision Date: 09.06.2016 ECRIMISIL CASE – WHERE THE CONDITION WILL BE REQUESTED TO BE REALIZED FROM USUFACTURING CONDITION FOR IMPROVEMENTS – DETERMINATION IF THE ACTUAL USE BINDING ALL STAKEHOLDERS HAS OCCURRED IN THE CONTRACTING PROPERTY WHERE THE 3-STOREY BUILDING IS LOCATED, SUMMARY: Except for the exceptions listed in terms […]
T.R. SUPREME COURT Legal DepartmentBasis: 2016/3404Decision: 2016/7050Decision Date: 09.06.2016 PREVENTION OF ELATMAN, DESTROYMENT ACTION – WHO OWNS THE FLOODED BUILDING MUST BE DETERMINED WITHOUT SUSPECT, AND THE WHOLE BUILDING MUST BE DUE TO STORAGE THE VALUE TO THE COURT AT THE COURT SUMMARY: All the records and documents regarding the zoning application are brought from […]
…TO THE JUDICIARY OF THE CIVIL COURT OF MAGIC Plaintiff: ADDRESS : ATTORNEY: ADDRESS : DEFENDANT: ADDRESS : SUBJECT : It consists of our request for the elimination of partnership in inheritance. DESCRIPTIONS : There is joint ownership between the plaintiff client and the defendant heirs on the immovable property registered in Sivas province, Kangal […]
TO THE CIVIL COURT OF MAGIC Plaintiff: TURKISH IDENTITY NUMBER : ADDRESS : ATTORNEY: (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) ADDRESS : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) DEFENDANTS: 1- 2nd- ADDRESS : SUBJECT : Request for Removal of Stakeholders in the Real Estate consists of. DESCRIPTIONS : 1- Our client, together with […]
WHAT IS THE CASE OF İZALE-İ SUYU (DISCLAIMER OF PARTNERSHIP)?Izale-i Şuyu or the lawsuit for dissolution of partnership is a type of lawsuit that brings about the transition to personal property by ending the partnership between the partners in the movable or immovable property subject to shared or joint ownership, and has similar consequences for […]
