Region Limitation and Time Limitation for the Implementation of the DecisionIn the Decision, it was clearly decided to stop the proceedings and proceedings “which are carried out throughout the country”.As of 20 March 2020, which is the date of publication and entry into force of the decision, 30 April 2020It has been decided that Article […]
Execution and non-execution of injunctionIn the doctrine, there have been discussions about the nature of the precautionary lien for a long time. Indeed, the General LawIn the decision of the Board of Directors No. 2008/12-25 dated 23.1.2008 and Decision No. 2008/3;“For this reason, the precautionary attachment is not an enforcement proceedings, but helps the actual […]
Status of Bankruptcy Proceedings and Concordat RequestsAlthough there is no provision regarding bankruptcy proceedings in Article 330 of the Law No. 2004, it is stated in the Decision.In addition to the enforcement proceedings, bankruptcy proceedings were also affected. For this reason, until 30.04.2020bankruptcy cannot be followed. For this reason, it should be accepted that the […]
Taking and Implementation of Precautionary Measures DecisionsIt is possible to take and implement the interim injunction decision within the period of suspension of execution. ForNo regulation has been made on this issue in the Decision. Until now, according to substantive lawHoliday is not applied for lawsuits to be filed. Cases opened and pendingThere is no […]
T.R. YARGITAY 13th Law Office Principle: 2015/ 41840 Decision: 2015 / 38474 Decision Date: 31.12.2015 Supreme Court Decision COURT: Civil Court of First Instance DECISION The case is related to the dispute arising from the insurance law. According to the amendment made in Article 27 of the Law on the Amendment of the Law on […]
T.R. YARGITAY 13th Law Office Principle: 2015/ 42401 Decision: 2015 / 38509 Decision Date: 31.12.2015 Supreme Court Decision COURT: Civil Court of First Instance DECISION The case is related to the dispute arising from the insurance law. According to the amendment made in Article 27 of the Law on the Amendment of the Law on […]
Republic of Turkey YARGITAY 22nd Law Office Principle: 2019/ 7019 Decision: 2019 / 17351 Decision Date: 26.09.2019 SUMMARY: In the concrete case; From the very beginning, the defendant Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. The decision to determine that he is the General Manager is in accordance with the scope of the file and the decision of reversal. […]
Republic of Turkey YARGITAY 22nd Law Office Principle: 2019/ 6983 Decision: 2019 / 17337 Decision Date: 26.09.2019 SUMMARY: In the concrete case; From the very beginning, the defendant Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. The decision to determine that he is the General Manager is in accordance with the scope of the file and the decision of reversal. […]
Republic of Turkey YARGITAY 22nd Law Office Basis: 2019/ 7021 Decision: 2019 / 17353 Decision Date: 26.09.2019 SUMMARY: In the concrete case; From the very beginning, the defendant Elektrik Üretim A.Ş. The decision to determine that he is the General Manager is in accordance with the scope of the file and the decision of reversal. […]
Republic of Turkey YARGITAY 22nd Law Office Base: 2019/ 5700 Decision: 2019 / 17173 Decision Date: 25.09.2019 SUMMARY: In the concrete case, it has been stated by the court that a large amount of equity reduction has been made in terms of overtime and weekly holiday wages. However, it was wrong not to specify the […]
