…….. MAGISTRATES ‘ HAKIMLIGI THE, REQUESTING (VICTIM) : TC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER : address : attorney : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) address : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) SUBJECT : Determining the illegality of the attack on our client via the Internet consists of our request to stop and remove the […]
………….. MAGISTRATES ‘ HAKIMLIGI THE, REQUESTING (VICTIM) : TC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER : address : attorney : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) address : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) SUBJECT : Determining the illegality of the attack on our client via the Internet consists of our request to stop and remove the […]
… TO THE MAGISTRATE’S OFFICE PROMPT OWNER : TC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER : address : attorney : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) address : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) OPPONENT : ADDRESS : SUBJECT : www….. It consists in Our Request to Remove the Content from the Publication at the Address and […]
SUPREME COURT 12. law officeMAINLY NO : 2018/47DECISION NO : 2018/6880 Regional justice above date and number writing in examination by the plaintiffs requested a decision by the court this term temyizen on work-related files have been sent to the apartment and rested for the audit report to file a claim held by a judge, […]
T.CSUPREME law officeBASE NO:16661/2016DECISION NO:2018/5566DATE OF DECISION:25.04.2018COURT :Family CourtTYPE OF CASE : Divorce- Removal of Alimony as a Precautionary Measure THE CANCELLATION OF THE ALIMONY FOR THE MEASURE IS NOT AN OCTOBER OF THE DIVORCE AND IS SUBJECT TO RELATIVE EXPENSES. SUBSEQUENT OPERATIONS CANNOT BE PERFORMED WITHOUT COMPLETING THE RELATIVE MORTAR. ABSTRACT: The claimant’s request […]
T.CSUPREME law officeISSUE NO:2016/16665DECISION NO:2018/5562DATE OF DECISION:25.04.2018COURT :Family CourtTYPE OF CASE : Divorce A WOMAN WHO WORKS AND HAS A PERMANENT INCOME IS NOT ENTITLED TO CHILD SUPPORT FOR POVERTY. At the end of the procedure of the case between the parties, the judgment given by the local court, the date and number of which […]
T.C.SUPREME law officeMAINLY NO: 2016/11600DECISION NO: 2018/441DATE OF DECISION: 7.2.2018 SIGNATURE OBJECTION – SIGNATURE SAMPLES MUST BE TAKEN IN FRONT OF THE PARTIES AT THE HEARING – SIGNATURE SAMPLES MUST BE MADE AFTER THE HEARING BY DECIDER 2004/m.72 SUMMARY : the plaintiff’s case-subject to the signature of the drawer is not to claim that his […]
SUPREME COURT 15. law officeE. 2018/21222018/1173 K. Plaintiffs 1-… 2-… which is the court of first instance for the case between the defendant …… and the decedent … . As a result of the appeal application for the decision No. 29.06.2017 and No. 2016/486-2017/204 issued by the Civil Court of First Instance … District Court […]
T.CSUPREME law officeISSUE NO:2016/19742DECISION NO:2018/2740DATE OF DECISION:22.03.2018TRIBUNAL : Employment Tribunal THE CASE FILE IN WHICH THE EMPLOYEE WILL RECEIVE LABOR IN TERMS OF THE SERVICE DETERMINATION REQUEST IS STRONG EVIDENCE AND IS NOT CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE. The plaintiff asked to decisively determine the work that took place between 08/02/2007 and 13/01/2009 at the workplace belonging to […]
T.CSUPREME law officeBASE NO:2016/16526DECISION NO:2018/5328DATE OF DECISION:19.04.2018COURT :Family CourtTYPE OF CASE :Mutual Divorce A MUTUAL DIVORCE CASE IS A PARTNER WHO SAYS THAT HE DOES NOT WANT HIS PARTNER IN HIS PRIVATE LIFE AND DOES NOT WANT TO BE TOGETHER IN A SEXUAL SENSE IS SEVERELY FLAWED Summary:the court decided to divorce the parties are […]
