T.C
SUPREME
- law office
BASE NO.2016/17354
DECISION NO.2018/5391
DATE OF DECISION.24.04.2018
COURT :Family Court
TYPE OF CASE : Divorce
THE MAIN THING IN ARRANGING CUSTODY IS THE SUPERIOR BENEFIT OF THE CHILD.
At the end of the reasoning of the case between the parties, the verdict given by the local court, the date and number shown above, was appealed by dec defendant male, the documents were read and discussed as necessary and considered:
1-Refer to the articles in the file, the evidence on which the decision is based, the reasons in accordance with the law, and in particular to Article 166/1 of the TMK of the case. although it was adopted in accordance with Article 166/3 of the resolution. according to the understanding that the writing of the article is a material error, the defendant
the man’s appeals, which fall outside the scope of the following paragraph, are unwarranted.
2-By the court, the custody of the common children born in 2004 and born in 2008 has been left to the plaintiff mother. The main thing in the organization of custody is the superior benefit of children. 4787 On the Establishment, Duties and Judicial Procedures of Family Courts
5 Of the Act. according to the article, the experts consisting of psychologists, pedagogues and social workers within the Family Court are requested to examine and report by interviewing both parents and children and; parties, shelter, income, according to their social and psychological state of children for the healthy development of situation are to investigate whether an obstacle to assume custody by the court, the rest of the children of age, cognitive, and other evidence by taking into consideration exchanged opinions with them, which is the parent of the children’s best interest to stay determined and a decision should be made about custody would be in when writing the missing terms in the terms and procedures for the establishment of review and investigation of custody and has required it is against the law to break it.
CONCLUSION: The above-mentioned provision of the appeal 2. according to the reason shown in the paragraph, there is no place for the examination of appeals for subsidiary child support for the reason of its DETERIORATION, according to the reason of the deterioration, and the other parts of the appeal that are outside the scope of the deterioration are listed above 1. it was unanimously decided to APPROVE it for the reason indicated in the paragraph, to return the advance fee of the appeal to the depositor on request, within 15 days from the notification of this decision, the way to correct the decision will be open. 24.04.2018
