T.C
SUPREME
- law office
ISSUE NO:2016/16665
DECISION NO:2018/5562
DATE OF DECISION:25.04.2018
COURT :Family Court
TYPE OF CASE : Divorce
A WOMAN WHO WORKS AND HAS A PERMANENT INCOME IS NOT ENTITLED TO CHILD SUPPORT FOR POVERTY.
At the end of the procedure of the case between the parties, the judgment given by the local court, the date and number of which are shown above, is appealed by the defendant male in terms of deciphering defects, alimony and compensation, the documents are read and discussed as necessary
thought:
1-According to the articles in the file, the evidence on which the decision is based, the reasons in accordance with the law, and in particular, there is no inaccuracy in the discretion of the evidence, the defendant’s appeals that fall outside the scope of the following paragraph are inappropriate.
2-It is understood from the collected evidence that the woman works, has a regular and constant income. TMK m for the benefit of women. 175 conditions have not been formed. While it was necessary to decide on the rejection of the claimant woman’s claim for alimony for poverty, the decision to accept it in writing was not correct and required overturning.
CONCLUSION: The above-mentioned provision of the appeal 2. if it is CORRUPTED for the reason shown in the paragraph, the sections subject to appeal that are outside the scope of the corruption are listed above. it was unanimously decided to APPROVE it for the reason indicated in the paragraph, to return the advance fee of the appeal to the depositor on request, within 15 days from the notification of this decision, the way to correct the decision will be open. 25.04.2018
