… TO THE PROSECUTOR GENERAL’S OFFICE
THE COMPLAINANT :
address :
attorney :
address :
suspicious :
CRIME :
HISTORY OF CRIME : …/…/…
INSTRUCTIONS
1- The client is a businessman engaged in construction/contracting work. As a contractor to the client, as owners of property on the other side, the suspect and the suspect’s brother, with the fall of shareholders regarding the construction of a new estate they own real estate and agreed between the parties together by the notary ……. Noterligi of…. Dated February 2011 and …with the Number of Members …………. According to their demands, they had their contract drawn up by a notary and signed this contract together, which they had arranged.
2- The old building, which belonged to the suspect and his brothers in accordance with the contract, was demolished by the client and a new construction was built in its place and the apartments were delivered to the rightful owners separately. But the suspect’s brothers are against my client because the new building is defective and some incomplete work has been done…….. …. Court ……. They replaced the receivable case with the main numbered file, and the suspect also replaced the case …….. he was shown as a witness by us at his recent trial and was called to the hearing. The suspect has been called to the trial as a witness because we think that he will not lie to the plaintiffs even though he is a brother and sister in the file he will testify to and will tell everything he witnessed straight away.
3 – Suspect‘, his wealth, honor, all on your beliefs and values and the sacred’ despite the suspension of a sworn declaration, of the Departments of the case itself, subject to the delivery area, although he also knows who and in what way that saves the apartment in question, even though he knows certain facts and also declares that it has approved with a signature saying You don’t know which things had not happened, or things that are like it was despite being otherwise stated.
4- The suspect declared in the witness statement that he had signed the delivery contract, that he had examined the building to be delivered duly, that he had signed this minutes with consent even at the trial, although he also confirmed the facts with his own signature, he made a false statement in court and misled justice.
LEGAL REASONS : 5237 P. K. m. 209 and related legislation.
LEGAL EVIDENCE : Witness statements and other evidence.
CONCLUSION AND CONCLUSION
It has been explained above, and will be taken into account on its own motion, for reasons we have outlined, which consists of 5 items, partially and completely harm the establishment of justice is a lie we claim that the statement of the witness for perjury and despite despite the misrepresentation when we ask persistently, also not to act contrary to the known facts by recourse to the statement of reasons for the judgment due to being an obstacle to peace-person investigation to be punished by a public trial that we respectfully request on behalf of my client decided to open it. …/…/…
Deputy Chairman
