2.Law office
Esas Numarası: 2016/24716
Karar Numarası: 2018/10846
COURT :Family Court
TYPE OF CASE: Divorce
At the end of the judgment of the relationship between the parties, to choose the date and the candidates, which is given by the local court, to prefer the case. deficiencies, rejected apartments, care and treatment alimony in red with attention to the amount of alimony, should be read and thought about.
1- According to the correct writing in the dossier, the reasons suitable for the evidence on which the decision is based, and especially the fact that there is no mistake in the evaluation of the evidence, the positives of the law around the dams on the road are unwarranted.
2- Court; “The defendant did not love his wife, he went out of use, he left without completing the mustkov residence, and from the review house with a trend.” Turkish Civil Law 174/1-2) was rejected.
In the defence of the civil case No. 6100 in the defence of the defendant, 1-d-e has been proven with the evidence in the answer, which is comprehensive with all the grounds of the defendant and with what evidences each case put forward as a summary of the defence.
In the concrete case; the defendant man did not give an answer in time and did not rely on his evidence. The defendant’s period for the preliminary examination for the notification of the unreliable relationship is ineffective and is not taken into account in the evaluation of the statements that they will not be notified in due time (HGK 20/04/2016 date, 2014/2-695 b. and 2016/522 decision election). In this court, the lawsuit should be consumed without taking the evidence and productions that are not put forward in the period of use as a basis. In the events that cause completion according to the defective situation, the defendant does not see it as possible; It could be the defendant who kicked his wife out of the house.
3- As explained in the 2nd paragraph above, the defendant man is at fault for the events that caused the work. The perpetrator is offensive to attack their own attacks. The plaintiff has been successful for the female employee materially and morally (Turkish Civil Law m.174/1-2). Depending on the wrong determination of the parties, the material and material assistance is correct.
CONCLUSION: In the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs of the appealed eye, it would be possible to deteriorate due to reasons on the way, and the target of the sections that remained intact in the 1st clause to be APPROVED, the return to the beneficiary from the target of the business advance fee, and the way of rectification to be decided within 15 days from the target of the work fee would be open. 09.10.2018(Tuesday)
