ANTALYA REGIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE COURT
TO BE SENT
TC ……… TECHNIQUES
DECISION NO : 498.06441/…….
DECISION DATE: 04.02.2018
CONTESTING :
Claim: Central …………..Neighborhood …. Name ….. Parcel ………. In 2017, A One-Story Building On The Field Property Was Built……………… Was constructed by then,if the immovable sold ………… also the subscriber has received electricity and water to the building on the real estate and zoning pursuant to apply to benefit from the peace of this document, therefore, that the mayor’s disregard of court decisions, a false document, edit the document claims he cheated on formal institutions.
DATE OF COMMUNIQUE :
Subject of Appeal: Alanya Prefect ………… history and ………. The Decision Consists Of Our Request For The Cancellation Of The Investigation Permit Granted In Accordance With The Numbered Decision.
INSTRUCTIONS
The Governorship Of Alanya ………dated ………. decision on granting permission to investigate numbered….. I’m shocked on the date it is received. But since I believe that the relevant decision is contrary to the procedure and the law, I have an obligation to make my objections during the period. As such, the relevant articles of the Law No. 4483 on the trial of civil servants and other public officials have been clearly violated.
While editing this document by me, a Building Registration Certificate was received by the people applying to my side and the necessary applications for the subscriber were made to the relevant units of the Alanya Municipality. Again, the document filled out by T-is a completed document requested by the Municipality of Alanya. For this reason, I do not accept statements of guilt and favor thrown at me.
4 Of the Aforementioned Law.§ 3.in the paragraph “according to this law, the report of complaints to be made about public officials and civil servants and other abstract and serious allegations or complaints to notice the lack of a general nature based on signs and documents specifying the person or event, tip, complaint or petition, the petitioner has the correct name, surname and signature it is imperative to have business or residence address.”A provision has been established in the form of. However, the document communicated to me was not based on any document and the allegations remained abstract.
The relevant articles of the Law No. 4483 on the trial of civil servants and other public officials have been clearly violated.
First, act 6 of 4483.according to the last paragraph of the article, the competent authority decides whether or not to allow an investigation on this report. It is imperative that these decisions are cited’
A statement is included, and only the abstract statements of the complainant are shown as justification in the decision communicated to me. .In this way ,it is considered that an investigation permit is granted with an ambiguous statement and even the reasons that require this permission are used to express doubts, as well as using statements in a manner that will cause suspicion, and also granting an investigation permit about me WITHOUT SHOWING A JUSTIFIED JUSTIFICATION BASED solely ON THE UNILATERAL STATEMENTS OF the APPLICANT, is contrary to the last paragraph of md6/of the law No. 4483.
6 of the same law again.in the article “the person or persons appointed with the preliminary investigation, inspectors from the Ministry themselves with the commissioning authority has all the powers of the Criminal Procedure Law and there is no provision in this law matters can operate according to; about the testimony of the officer or other public officer review is located within its powers by taking the views and gather the necessary information and documents that permit Editing provide a report that contains status by the competent authority. If the preliminary review was conducted by more than one person, different opinions are stated separately in the report for their reasons.
The competent authority decides whether or not to allow an investigation on this report. It is imperative that these decisions are justified.” When all these issues are evaluated together, the decision communicated to me constitutes a violation of procedure and the law. Because the abstract claims reflected in the decision were not justified by documents and the preliminary examination specified in the law was not carried out in accordance with the legislation. An inspector or officer authorized to conduct a preliminary examination receives witness statements with the statements of the person who has been pre-examined and the complainant, if any, and collects all kinds of evidence, information and documents related to the investigation. The authorized inspector or officer conducting the preliminary examination prepares a report that also evaluates the views and evidence generated as a result of the preliminary examination and submits the situation to the competent authority to allow it. During the preliminary examination, the opinions of my party were not appealed, and in this case, the decision in accordance with the prepared report is also a violation of the law.
Although the subject of the complaint does not accept the accusation,for the reasons described above,the complainant’s claims are abstract and general in nature, and while they should not be accepted by the District Governor of Alanya, it is illegal and illegal to accept them. This is an unfair accusation that the complainant put forward to victimize me.For these reasons, it is impossible for me to accept the accusation.
CONCLUSION and REQUEST
For the reasons described above and for the reasons to be considered resen, the prefect of Alanya 0……….. date and ……….Decision No.I sincerely wish that your appeal of the decision to grant permission to investigate me was removed, that there was no place to grant permission to investigate, and that my appeal was accepted.
CONTESTING
